Saturday, 18 January 2014

Remembering Sir Henry Morton Stanley (18 January 1841 - 10 May 1904)


Sir Henry Morton Stanley (born John Rowlands), was born 173 years ago today.

Sir Henry was one of the great explorers of Africa in the Victorian era, along with Richard Burton, John Speke, Samuel Baker, James Grant, and Stanley's inspiration, David Livingstone. In his day, central Africa was a big unknown: the map for this region was a blank.

Stanley authored a number of books:
  • How I Found Livingstone in Central Africa (1872)
  • My Kululu, Prince, King and Slave (1873)
  • Coomassie and Magdala (1874)
  • Through the Dark Continent, 2 vols. (1878)
  • The Congo and the Founding of Its Free State (1885)
  • My African Travels (1886)
  • In Darkest Africa, 2 vols. (1890)
  • My Dark Companions and Their Strange Stories (1893)
  • My Early Travels and Adventures in America and Asia, 2 vols. (1895)
  • Through South Africa (1898)
The travel texts offer fascinating and highly educational insights into the unbelievably difficult conditions of central Africa, its peoples, and their environment, particularly along the Congo, as encountered by Europeans for the first time. The mortality rate on each of these trail-blazing expeditions, due to disease, infection, starvation, and attacks from hostile tribes (including cannibals), was enormous. Explorers at this time had no GPS, motorised vehicles, or satellite communications; they were, for all intents and purposes, completely cut off from the outside world, with which they were only able to communicate via hand-written letters, which would take half a year to arrive. There were, of course, no roads, no maps, no amenities. Everything they needed for a three-year expedition had to be carried by hand. Food had to be sourced locally, in a terrain that was entirely unknown and from tribes who could not understand what they were seeing. Any river transport had to be obtained locally, or carved out of trunks. On his first expedition, Stanley sufferent from malarial fever twenty-three times. On his second expedition, he was the only White man left—indeed, by the time he reached the Portuguese traders on the Western coast of Africa, he had become so used to seeing Black faces that he found Europeans weirdly pale. On each he was lucky to have made it alive.

A world of caution, though: sometimes Stanley's account exaggerate the number of expedition members and engage in a certain amount of posturing. Also, The Congo and the Founding of Its Free State is unreliable because his patron, King Leopold II, self-servingly exercised his right to editorial control. For example, treaties granting sovereignty of Congo land were attributed to Stanley when the latter only signed treaties granting tenancy rights.

In the 1890s Stanley also worked on an autobiography, which could have been his most enduring work, but he abandoned the project. The extant text would, nevertheless, be edited by his widow, Dorothy Stanley (née Tennant) and published as The Autobiography of H. M. Stanley (New York: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1909). Because Stanley reinvented himself while in the United States in the 1860s, his autobiography is not entirely reliable.

Stanley's legacy is controversial. His exploration initially opened new routes for the Arab-Swahili slave traders, who had been in the continent since the 9th century, and been responsible for the devastation of villages and the depopulation of the region. His subsequent effort to build trade stations along to Congo for Leopold II, King of the Belgians, later proved the first stage in the formation of a colony, the Congo Free State, which became notorious for the ruthless manner in which it was run and exploited for natural resources. This was very different from what Stanley had wanted to do, which was simply to break the Arab-Swahili slavers by introducing free trade under a regime of tenancies, agreed with the local chiefs: the idea was that if Africans could sell raw materials to the European industrial powers, they would no longer need to sell each other, and would thereby destroy the market for slaves. Stanley also wanted a ban on the sale of arms and gunpowder to Africa. He viewed his role as humanitarian, but Leopold II, whose ambition was to own a colony in the Congo and form trade monopolies, kept him in the dark about his intentions. For a number of reasons, Stanley's own published accounts of his expeditions also contributed to the decline in his moral reputation. Biographers have condemned him until recently. Tim Jeal's Stanley: The Impossible Life of Africa's Greatest Explorer (2007) is, therefore, a welcome revisionist effort, aimed at rehabilitating this extraordinary man; it benefits from a mass of previously inaccessible source material. I will be reviewing Jeal's biography very soon.

Parts of Stanley's life have been brought to the screen. There is the 1939 film, Stanley and Livingstone; the BBC's 1971 dramatised six-part documentary Search for the Nile; and the National Geographic's made-for-television 1997 film, Forbidden Territory: Stanley's Search for Livingstone. Stanley also appears in Simon Gray's 1978 play, The Rear Column.

Wednesday, 8 January 2014

Remembering Anthony Ludocivi (8 January 1882 - 3 April 1971)

British philosopher, sociologist, and social critic Anthony Mario Ludovici was born 132 years ago today.
Though he wrote on many subjects, including art, metaphysics, politics, economics, religion, differences between sexes, race, and eugenics, Ludovici is best known for being a proponent of aristocracy. Perhaps not surprisingly, he was at first an artist (as book illustrator) and a student of Nietzsche. With Nietzsche and Art, published in 1911, he was said to have attempted a history of art in terms of rising aristocratic and decadent democratic epochs.

Last year I reviewed his 1967 book, The Specious Origins of Liberalism, which, being long out of print, was serialised on this website. In my review discuss this volume in the context of egalitarianism as the West's main ethical problem in the West (hence the title: 'Quality, Not Equality').

Previously, we published A. Briton's biographical sketch, "Anthony Ludovici: Conservative from Another World". In his article, Briton focuses on Ludovici's thoughts on race, but I think this is very one-dimensional, and falls into the trap of reaction: because of the vulgar obsession with race among liberals and the Left over the past two or three generations, and because Ludovici's positions are frankly and unapologetically contrary to those favoured by the aforementioned, many anti-egalitarians become obsessed with race too, and will talk about nothing else, expending all their energy on discussions of biology and evidence that are completely irrelevant, since egalitarianism derives its legitimacy from ethical arguments, and not from empirical fact. This, I think, is a major distraction, not to mention a bore, because it focuses on consequences rather than causes, on incidental phenomena rather than on first principles, which is where any disestablishmentarian effort has to begin if it is to stay focused on the endgame as opposed to the skirmishes along the way. The important parts in the thought of men like Ludovici are in the philosophical critiques of egalitarianism in its various manifestations and in the articulation of the ethics of an aristocratic worldview. Said worldview—and for that matter any anti-establishment worldview—will remain the province of the natural contrarian, the eccentric, or the outsider as long as the public are not given an ethical justification for it with which they can defend it.

The website http://www.anthonymludovici.com features a selection of his book illustrations, photographs, and an archive of his writings, including entire fiction and non-fiction books, short stories, essays and articles, poetry, translations, correspondence, and legal documents.

You can also obtain directly from us The Lost Philosopher: The Best of Anthony Ludovici (2003), edited by John V. Day, here.